A
1. Students need to rally together to get the cost of schooling down to evidently get student debt reduced
2. Her argument is pretty absolute because she knows that student debt is a problem because the prices to go to school is so great, and she knows that there needs to be a change in it and it has to come from students
3. She states that it might not assert the claim if something went wrong in a protest
B
1. A.) The cost to attend school is putting people in thousands of dollars in debt
B.) Without a unified voice, individual protests can only make a small ripple
2. A.) “Tuition discounting is possible only at a tiny percentage of well-endowed private schools serving a tiny percentage of students.At selective colleges in 2004, only 10 percent of students came from the bottom half of the income scale
B.) In February of 2005, fifteen students at Yale organized a sit-in until they were removed by police. One week after the sit-in, Yale announced that it would no longer expect any tuition contribution at all from the families earning less than $45,000 a year.
3. Yes the evidence is good and accurate. This evidence is relevant to the reasons because it shows how her reasons are being seen in her essay
C
1. Students are what makes the changes in schools. Schools do not see a problem with their costs because they aren’t paying for it, so students have to speak up and make the change
2. I do share these assumptions because I think that if you aren’t being effected by this then you aren’t aware of the problems so i think its in the hands of the students to make the change if they want it
D
1. Kamenetz’s only rebuttal seems to be that if students were to protest for what they want, something wrong could happen in their protest
Kendall's Blog 