CL 2/11

8. Kamenetz’s rhetorical appeal in her essay can be seen as reason and emotional appeal. She uses real life examples to show you how students struggle understanding concepts that have to do with money. She says that teenagers and young adults today do not know the dangers of debt when doing things such as signing a loan or even opening a credit card. She also says “If we dont march for us, who will?”
9. Kamenetz’s aim of argument in this essay would be arguing to inquire. She wants everyone to take notice that there is a problem in the way young adults are informed about how they can inquire debt so easily. She sees that there is a problem and there needs to be a way to fix it.She also uses arguing to persuade because she is trying to get students to stand up for what they want and form a political action committee.
10. I would say that Kamenetz does meet the criteria of reasonable reasoning because she is well informed on the issue she is presenting and she seems to be open minded by acknowledging that things could go wrong in a protest